NYTimes. Huddling in a drawing room with his top commanders, General Franks told them it was time to make plans to leave. Combat forces should be prepared to start pulling out within 60 days if all went as expected, he said. By September, the more than 140,000 troops in Iraq could be down to little more than a division, about 30,000 troops.
If the United States and its allies wanted to maintain the same ratio of peacekeepers to population as it had in Kosovo, the briefing said, they would have to station 480,000 troops in Iraq. If Bosnia was used as benchmark, 364,000 troops would be needed. If Afghanistan served as the model, only 13,900 would be needed in Iraq. [John Robb’s Weblog]
There are a couple of interesting things here. First, note Franks’ Orwellian definition of “leave.” If troops leave a country, they have to actually be gone. A division of troops (with four more divisions from other countries) is not gone, it’s just a reduced garrison.
Second, note how the Feds were holding up Afghanistan as their model for deciding how many troops to garrison Iraq with. However, there’s no mention of the differences in what those troops were expected to do. In Afghanistan Federal soldiers only occupy Kabul, protecting the puppet government there, and basically leave the rest of the country alone except for sporadic search-and-destroy missions. I’ve seen nothing to suggest that the Feds ever intended anything less than full control of the entirety of Iraq, not just Baghdad.