Ken's Weblog

People should not fear their governments; governments should fear their people.

Tag: Politics

  • The reason for the masks

    In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.

    Theodore Dalrymple

  • If only they had to obey their own laws

    How many federal laws would I be breaking…. …if I suggested that the world would be a better, cleaner place if this person and all his sycophants choked to death on cans of caffeinated alcohol?

    I note that Sch**er adds a nice incongruous touch:

    Let This Serve as a Warning to Anyone Who Tries to Peddle Dangerous Beverages to Our Kids, Do it, And We Will Shut You Down

    [The Ultimate Answer to Kings]

    Naturally I don’t spend much time in government buildings, but I know that both prisons public schools and courthouses have drinking fountains. I don’t think there’s any beverage on Earth that’s killed more people than water…

  • What the election is really all about

    Prepared headlines for Wednesday. It all comes down to a choice between the left-wing socialist and the right-wing socialist.

    Southerners prefer a socialist who will redistribute the wealth from the taxpayers to government employees (military), agricultural interests, and corporations with “defense” contracts. They also prefer someone who bombs lots of foreigners in the name of “national greatness.”

    Northerners prefer a socialist who will redistribute wealth from the taxpayers to government employees (non-military), the urban poor, and union members. They also prefer someone who will bomb lots of foreigners (albeit with less bravado) in the name of “human rights.” [LewRockwell.com Blog]

    That’s what presidential elections are, today: deciding which socialist warmonger you want ruling the Evil Empire. “Change” was never one of the choices.

  • On collectivism

    Obama-Mania.

    Larken Rose has penned yet another essay in his TMDS series (The Most Dangerous Superstition: the belief in imposed authority). He explains what collectivism is, why it always leads to violence, and why Obama, McCain, and every other Republican and Democrat candidate are all collectivists.

    [End the War on Freedom]

    It’s a good, and lengthy, article that covers some of the same ground as The Road to Serfdom. The following is from his conclusion:

    Barrack Obama is a collectivist. Despite the usual window-dressing
    and euphemisms which conceal the true nature of what he advocates,
    he is, in every way, an advocate for the idea that every individual–
    and all wealth–is the property of the collective, as represented
    by “government.” In other words, he believes in communism.

    So should everyone vote for John McCain? No. Mr. McCain is also a
    collectivist. In fact, with very rare exceptions, ALL Democrat and
    Republican politicians are collectivists, as they have been for
    many decades, even back when they were feigning concern about the
    “spread of communism.” So why did I focus on Obama? Because, unlike
    Mr. McCain, Mr. Obama seems to have a lot of enthusiastic support
    from well-meaning, albeit misguided, Americans. As with Bill
    Clinton, Mr. Obama makes the advocacy of widespread government
    violence, theft and oppression sound both noble and useful. It is
    not.

    So if all of the above was not intended to make you vote for
    someone–and it certainly was not–then what is being suggested?
    Intellectual honesty. First, I want people to understand what the
    self-proclaimed “leaders” are actually proposing, because it is not
    “hope,” or “change,” or “progress,” or any of the other vague, feel-
    good rhetoric being fed to the general public. It is what EVERY
    government “leader” always proposes: more power for the state, less
    freedom for the people. They pretend to have the purest motives for
    it, but the means to their goals will ALWAYS be less freedom for
    you, and more power for them.

    After people realize that, next I want them to be honest about
    their OWN beliefs and agenda. If, for example, you support any of
    the collectivist redistribution plans and programs pitched by both
    major parties, then I simply ask that you drop the charade, set
    aside the euphemisms and obfuscations, and do it openly and
    honestly. If you believe that there is someone somewhere whose
    supposed “need” entitles him to what my time and effort have
    produced, with or without my consent, then pick up a gun, come to
    my house, and take it from me yourself. Don’t hide such destructive
    evil behind elections, legislation, and political rhetoric. Do it
    openly and honestly, or don’t do it at all. If you give your vote
    to ANY collectivist, you are just as guilty of robbing me, and
    robbing a couple hundred million other people, as if you had done
    it yourself. But in addition to being a thief, you’d also be a
    fraud and a coward, because you lie (maybe even to yourself) about
    what it is you advocate, and don’t have the spine to go do it
    yourself.

  • Truth in advertising

    Get disappointed by someone new

    I came across this amusing bumper sticker—it’s probably the closest we’ll ever see to an honest campaign ad. However, I think it’s too optimistic. Experience suggests that if Obama does indeed win the election, the Obamessiah cult will praise him to the heavens for continuing to do exactly the same things that Bush has been doing for the past eight years, while the Busheviks will condemn him as the Antichrist for doing exactly the same things that Bush has been doing. And of course none of them will ever acknowledge that their “beliefs” have reversed overnight, any more than they did when Bush replaced Clinton.